Norman Geislers unique perspective on the Arminian vs. Calvinism debate
Dr. Geisler does a good job of defending freewill but then turns around ultimately defends a view that logically reduces back to compatablism ( soft determinism ) in other chaptrers then his “moderate calvinst” view of election winds up being God and man choose each other at same time but this compromise view is simply unecessary the bible clearly teaches election conditional upon faith and nowhere teaches Cavlinst unconditional election which is historically merely a gnostic presuppostion not a biblical one.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.